You see it on every premium lot card: "92 points." It looks precise and authoritative — but 92 out of what, measured how, and judged by whom? For anyone buying green coffee, understanding the score behind the number is one of the most useful skills there is.
Here is what the 100-point scale actually means, who assigns it, and why a verified score is worth far more than a self-reported one.
Key takeaways
- Coffee is scored on a 100-point scale; specialty coffee begins at 80.
- 90+ is the rare "outstanding" tier — not the threshold for specialty.
- Scores come from trained tasters, typically Q-graders licensed by the CQI.
- A self-reported score is a starting point; competition and third-party results verify it.
- The SCA's new Coffee Value Assessment is changing how scoring works (see our explainer).
The 100-point scale, briefly
Specialty coffee is graded on a scale out of 100, and the entry point for "specialty" is 80 points. From there, the bands climb: roughly 80–84.99 is very good, 85–89.99 is excellent, and 90–100 is outstanding. That top band is rare — most very good coffees never reach it — which is exactly why a genuine 90+ commands attention and price.
The number isn't arbitrary: it's the sum of how a coffee performs across attributes like aroma, flavour, aftertaste, acidity, body, balance and sweetness, judged in a structured tasting called a cupping.
Who scores it — the Q-grader
A score is only as good as the person and method behind it. In specialty coffee that person is usually a Q-grader — a taster licensed by the Coffee Quality Institute (CQI) to score coffee against a common, calibrated standard. The point of the licence is consistency: a score from one qualified grader should mean roughly the same thing as a score from another, whether the cupping happens in Colombia or in your QC lab.
What actually gets scored
Traditionally, a cupper rates a coffee across about ten attributes — fragrance and aroma, flavour, aftertaste, acidity, body, balance, uniformity, clean cup, sweetness and an overall impression — and the points add up to the final score, with defects subtracted. It's worth knowing that the SCA has introduced a new framework, the Coffee Value Assessment (CVA), which reorganises how coffee is described and scored; we cover it in detail in our CVA explainer. Whichever system is used, the principle is the same: turn a structured tasting into a comparable number.
Why a self-reported score isn't the whole story
Here's the part buyers should hold onto: a score printed by the seller is a useful starting point, not a guarantee. The same coffee can score a little differently between tasters and sessions, and a number with no context is easy to inflate. The strongest signal is independent verification — a result from a recognised competition, or a third-party review — because it doesn't rely on the seller's word. So when you assess a lot, look for a recent score, the cupping notes that justify it, and ideally an external result to back it up.
A real example
This is why we lean on outside results, not just our own cupping. Several of our washed Nariño Geishas were finalists at the 2025 Mejor Taza de Nariño — a regional competition judged against more than 350 micro-lots — placing 3rd, 6th and 10th, with scores from 90.25 to 90.75. Our own CQI-certified Q-grader cups and scores every lot we offer, and the full breakdown travels with the coffee; but a competition placement is the kind of third-party proof that turns a number into something you can trust.
See our current lots with their scores and cupping notes, or get in touch to talk through what fits your roast — samples of any lot are available on request.